Agent skill

debug

Systematic error debugging with analysis, solution discovery, and verification

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/data/debug-skills

SKILL.md

<quick_start> Debug an error (interactive):

bash
/debug login page crashes on submit

Auto mode (fully automatic, use recommended solutions):

bash
/debug -a API returning 500 on POST

What it does:

  1. Analyze: Reproduce error, identify root cause → ask if you have more context
  2. Find Solutions: Research 2-3+ potential fixes with pros/cons
  3. Propose: Present options → you choose which solution
  4. Fix: Implement solution with strategic logging
  5. Verify: Multi-layer verification (Static → Build → Runtime)

Key principle: Tests passing ≠ fix working. Always execute the actual code path.

Note: Only 2 questions in the entire workflow:

  1. After analysis: "Do you have additional info?"
  2. After finding solutions: "Which solution to implement?" </quick_start>
  1. Reproduce Before Anything Else - If you can't reproduce it, you can't verify the fix
  2. Hypothesis-Driven Analysis - List 3-5 causes ranked by likelihood, test systematically
  3. Multi-Layer Verification - Tests alone give false confidence (20-40% still fail in production) </core_principles>

<verification_pyramid> Verification Pyramid:

        ┌─────────────┐
        │   Manual    │  ← User confirms
        └──────┬──────┘
     ┌─────────┴─────────┐
     │ Runtime Execution │  ← CRITICAL: Real execution
     └─────────┬─────────┘
   ┌───────────┴───────────┐
   │   Automated Checks    │  ← Build, Types, Lint, Tests
   └───────────┬───────────┘
 ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
 │     Static Analysis       │  ← Syntax, Imports
 └───────────────────────────┘

Key Insight: Tests passing ≠ fix working. ALWAYS execute the actual code path. </verification_pyramid>

Flag Name Description
-a, --auto Auto mode Full automatic mode - don't ask the user, use recommended solutions

Arguments:

  • Everything after flags = {error_context} - Description of the error or context about what's failing

<state_variables> Persist throughout all steps:

Variable Type Description
{error_context} string User's description of the error
{auto_mode} boolean Skip confirmations, use recommended options
{error_analysis} object Detailed analysis from step 1
{solutions} list Potential solutions found in step 2
{selected_solution} object User's chosen solution from step 3
{files_modified} list Files changed during the fix
{verification_result} object Results from verification step

</state_variables>

<entry_point> Load steps/step-00-init.md </entry_point>

<step_files>

Step File Description
0 step-00-init.md Parse flags, setup state
1 step-01-analyze.md Reproduce error, form hypotheses, identify root cause
2 step-02-find-solutions.md Research 2-3+ solutions with pros/cons
3 step-03-propose.md Present solutions for user selection
4 step-04-fix.md Implement with strategic logging
5 step-05-verify.md Multi-layer verification (Static → Build → Runtime → User)
</step_files>

<success_criteria>

  • Error successfully reproduced
  • Root cause identified through hypothesis testing
  • 2-3+ potential solutions researched with pros/cons
  • Solution selected (by user or auto mode)
  • Fix implemented with strategic logging
  • Static analysis passes (syntax, imports)
  • Build completes successfully
  • Tests pass (if tests exist)
  • Runtime execution verified (actual code path executed)
  • User confirms fix resolves the original issue
  • No regressions introduced </success_criteria>

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results