Agent skill

controlling-costs

Analyzes Axiom query patterns to find unused data, then builds dashboards and monitors for cost optimization. Use when asked to reduce Axiom costs, find unused columns or field values, identify data waste, or track ingest spend.

Stars 6
Forks 0

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/axiomhq/skills/tree/main/skills/controlling-costs

SKILL.md

Axiom Cost Control

Dashboards, monitors, and waste identification for Axiom usage optimization.

Before You Start

  1. Load required skills:

    skill: axiom-sre
    skill: building-dashboards
    

    Building-dashboards provides: dashboard-list, dashboard-get, dashboard-create, dashboard-update, dashboard-delete

  2. Find the audit dataset. Try axiom-audit first:

    apl
    ['axiom-audit']
    | where _time > ago(1h)
    | summarize count() by action
    | where action in ('usageCalculated', 'runAPLQueryCost')
    
    • If not found → ask user. Common names: axiom-audit-logs-view, audit-logs
    • If found but no usageCalculated events → wrong dataset, ask user
  3. Verify axiom-history access (required for Phase 4):

    apl
    ['axiom-history'] | where _time > ago(1h) | take 1
    

    If not found, Phase 4 optimization will not work.

  4. Confirm with user:

    • Deployment name?
    • Audit dataset name?
    • Contract limit in TB/day? (required for Phase 3 monitors)
  5. Replace <deployment> and <audit-dataset> in all commands below.

Tips:

  • Run any script with -h for full usage
  • Do NOT pipe script output to head or tail — causes SIGPIPE errors
  • Requires jq for JSON parsing
  • Use axiom-sre's axiom-query for ad-hoc APL, not direct CLI

Which Phases to Run

User request Run these phases
"reduce costs" / "find waste" 0 → 1 → 4
"set up cost control" 0 → 1 → 2 → 3
"deploy dashboard" 0 → 2
"create monitors" 0 → 3
"check for drift" 0 only

Phase 0: Check Existing Setup

bash
# Existing dashboard?
dashboard-list <deployment> | grep -i cost

# Existing monitors?
axiom-api <deployment> GET "/v2/monitors" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | startswith("Cost Control:")) | "\(.id)\t\(.name)"'

If found, fetch with dashboard-get and compare to templates/dashboard.json for drift.


Phase 1: Discovery

bash
scripts/baseline-stats -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset>

Captures daily ingest stats and produces the Analysis Queue (needed for Phase 4).


Phase 2: Dashboard

bash
scripts/deploy-dashboard -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset>

Creates dashboard with: ingest trends, burn rate, projections, waste candidates, top users. See reference/dashboard-panels.md for details.


Phase 3: Monitors

Contract is required. You must have the contract limit from preflight step 4.

Step 1: List available notifiers

bash
scripts/list-notifiers -d <deployment>

Present the list to the user and ask which notifier they want for cost alerts. If they don't want notifications, proceed without -n.

Step 2: Create monitors

bash
scripts/create-monitors -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset> -c <contract_tb> [-n <notifier_id>]

Creates 3 monitors:

  1. Total Ingest Guard — alerts when daily ingest >1.2x contract OR 7-day avg grows >15% vs baseline
  2. Per-Dataset Spike — robust z-score detection, alerts per dataset with attribution
  3. Query Cost Spike — hardened z-score with 30d baseline, 5d exclusion gap, persistence-based gating (median_z > 3, p25_z > 2.5)

The spike monitors use notifyByGroup: true so each dataset triggers a separate alert.

See reference/monitor-strategy.md for threshold derivation.


Phase 4: Optimization

Get the Analysis Queue

Run scripts/baseline-stats if not already done. It outputs a prioritized list:

Priority Meaning
P0⛔ Top 3 by ingest OR >10% of total — MANDATORY
P1 Never queried — strong drop candidate
P2 Rarely queried (Work/GB < 100) — likely waste

Work/GB = query cost (GB·ms) / ingest (GB). Lower = less value from data.

Analyze datasets in order

Work top-to-bottom. For each dataset:

Step 1: Column analysis

bash
scripts/analyze-query-coverage -d <deployment> -D <dataset> -a <audit-dataset>

If 0 queries → recommend DROP, move to next.

Step 2: Field value analysis

Pick a field from suggested list (usually app, service, or kubernetes.labels.app):

bash
scripts/analyze-query-coverage -d <deployment> -D <dataset> -a <audit-dataset> -f <field>

Note values with high volume but never queried (⚠️ markers).

Step 3: Handle empty values

If (empty) has >5% volume, you MUST drill down with alternative field (e.g., kubernetes.namespace_name).

Step 4: Record recommendation

For each dataset, note: name, ingest volume, Work/GB, top unqueried values, action (DROP/SAMPLE/KEEP), estimated savings.

Done when

All P0⛔ and P1 datasets analyzed. Then compile report using reference/analysis-report-template.md.



Cleanup

bash
# Delete monitors
axiom-api <deployment> GET "/v2/monitors" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | startswith("Cost Control:")) | "\(.id)\t\(.name)"'
axiom-api <deployment> DELETE "/v2/monitors/<id>"

# Delete dashboard
dashboard-list <deployment> | grep -i cost
dashboard-delete <deployment> <id>

Note: Running create-monitors twice creates duplicates. Delete existing monitors first if re-deploying.


Reference

Audit Dataset Fields

Field Description
action usageCalculated or runAPLQueryCost
properties.hourly_ingest_bytes Hourly ingest in bytes
properties.hourly_billable_query_gbms Hourly query cost
properties.dataset Dataset name
resource.id Org ID
actor.email User email

Common Fields for Value Analysis

Dataset type Primary field Alternatives
Kubernetes logs kubernetes.labels.app kubernetes.namespace_name, kubernetes.container_name
Application logs app or service level, logger, component
Infrastructure host region, instance
Traces service.name span.kind, http.route

Units & Conversions

  • Scripts use TB/day
  • Dashboard filter uses GB/month
Contract TB/day GB/month
5 PB/month 167 5,000,000
10 PB/month 333 10,000,000
15 PB/month 500 15,000,000

Optimization Actions

Signal Action
Work/GB = 0 Drop or stop ingesting
High-volume unqueried values Sample or reduce log level
Empty values from system namespaces Filter at ingest or accept
WoW spike Check recent deploys

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

axiomhq/skills

axiom-sre

Expert SRE investigator for incidents and debugging. Uses hypothesis-driven methodology and systematic triage. Can query Axiom observability when available. Use for incident response, root cause analysis, production debugging, or log investigation.

6 0
Explore
axiomhq/skills

building-dashboards

Designs and builds Axiom dashboards via API. Covers chart types, APL and metrics/MPL query patterns, SmartFilters, layout, and configuration options. Use when creating dashboards, migrating from Splunk, or configuring chart options.

6 0
Explore
axiomhq/skills

writing-evals

Scaffolds evaluation suites for the Axiom AI SDK. Generates eval files, scorers, flag schemas, and config from natural-language descriptions. Use when creating evals, writing scorers, setting up flag schemas, or configuring axiom.config.ts.

6 0
Explore
axiomhq/skills

spl-to-apl

Translates Splunk SPL queries to Axiom APL. Provides command mappings, function equivalents, and syntax transformations. Use when migrating from Splunk, converting SPL queries, or learning APL equivalents of SPL patterns.

6 0
Explore
axiomhq/skills

query-metrics

Runs metrics queries against Axiom MetricsDB via scripts. Discovers available metrics, tags, and tag values. Use when asked to query metrics, explore metric datasets, check metric values, or investigate OTel metrics data.

6 0
Explore
axiomhq/gilfoyle

gilfoyle

SRE agent that does what you can't. Queries your observability stack. Finds root causes. Doesn't panic. Doesn't guess. Doesn't care about your feelings. Use for incident response, debugging, root cause analysis, or log analysis.

201 10
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results