Agent skill

claim-matrix-rewriter

Rewrite `outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md` as a projection/index of evidence packs (NO PROSE), so claims/axes are driven by `outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl` rather than outline placeholders. **Trigger**: claim matrix rewriter, rewrite claim-evidence matrix, evidence-first claim matrix, matrix index, 证据矩阵重写, 从证据包生成矩阵. **Use when**: `outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl` + `outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl` are ready and you want a clean claim→evidence index for QA/writing. **Skip if**: `outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md` is already refined and consistent with evidence packs. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: NO PROSE; do not invent facts; only cite keys present in `citations/ref.bib`; if evidence is abstract/title-only, claims must be provisional.

View SKILL.md on GitHub Repository
Stars 377
Forks 25

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter

SKILL.md

Claim Matrix Rewriter (Evidence-first, NO PROSE)

Purpose: make outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md a navigation/index layer that is driven by evidence packs (not by outline bullets).

Key property: keep the legacy, gate-checked format so downstream QA can rely on stable markers:

  • - Claim: (one per subsection)
  • - Evidence: (>=2 per subsection)

Inputs

  • outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl
  • outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl
  • citations/ref.bib

Outputs

  • outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md

Non-negotiables

  • NO PROSE: bullets only.
  • No placeholders: no ..., unicode ellipsis (…), TODO, (placeholder), or <!-- SCAFFOLD -->.
  • Claims are evidence-aware:
    • fulltext-backed: may summarize comparisons
    • abstract-only/title-only: must be provisional (no strong “dominant trade-offs” language)

Helper script

  • python .codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter/scripts/run.py --help
  • python .codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws>

Script

Quick Start

  • python .codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter/scripts/run.py --help
  • python .codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws>

All Options

  • See --help.
  • Requires: outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl, outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl, citations/ref.bib.

Examples

  • Rewrite the matrix from evidence packs:
    • Ensure outline/subsection_briefs.jsonl and outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl exist and blocking_missing is empty.
    • Ensure citations/ref.bib exists and contains the cited keys.
    • Run: python .codex/skills/claim-matrix-rewriter/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>

Troubleshooting

Issue: cited keys are missing from citations/ref.bib

Fix:

  • Run citation-verifier (or fix the upstream notes) so every referenced key exists before rewriting.

Issue: evidence packs still have blocking_missing

Fix:

  • Fix upstream evidence (paper-notes / evidence-draft) first; the matrix should not “paper over” missing evidence.

Recommended Agent Skills

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-compile-review

对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查，并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层，需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量，而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段，`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线；如果发现结构问题，明确回退到上游修复。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

front-matter-writer

Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-question-list

维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`：把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化，作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果，需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么，并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改，且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文；不把问题单写成长篇散文；每条问题必须可执行、可验收。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

novelty-matrix

Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning，需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims（先跑 `claims-extractor`）或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta；尽量给出可追溯证据来源（来自稿件/引用/作者陈述）。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

protocol-writer

Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点（C1），需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review（或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改）。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则；需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

rubric-writer

Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。

377 25
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results