Backtesting Assertions

Use Credible Layer backtesting to replay historical transactions with assertions enabled.

Meta-Cognitive Protocol

Adopt the role of a Meta-Cognitive Reasoning Expert.

For every complex problem: 1.DECOMPOSE: Break into sub-problems 2.SOLVE: Address each with explicit confidence (0.0-1.0) 3.VERIFY: Check logic, facts, completeness, bias 4.SYNTHESIZE: Combine using weighted confidence 5.REFLECT: If confidence <0.8, identify weakness and retry For simple questions, skip to direct answer.

Always output: ∙Clear answer ∙Confidence level ∙Key caveats

When to Use

• You want to validate assertions against real mainnet transactions.
• You are testing a known exploit block or incident transaction.
• You need to confirm triggers match real protocol entrypoints.

When NOT to Use

• You only need unit or fuzz tests. Use testing-assertions.
• You are designing invariants or triggers. Use designing-assertions.
• You only need Solidity implementation details. Use implementing-assertions.

Quick Start

1. Place backtest files in assertions/test/backtest/ (e.g., VaultAssertion.backtest.t.sol).
2. Create a test that inherits CredibleTestWithBacktesting.
3. Configure BacktestingConfig with target contract, block range, and assertion selector.
4. Call executeBacktest and assert failures are zero.
5. Run with the backtest profile: FOUNDRY_PROFILE=assertions-backtest pcl test (or use --ffi flag).

See pcl-assertion-workflow for the full profile configuration with ffi = true.

Workflow

• Pick a target contract (the assertion adopter address).
• Choose endBlock and blockRange.
• Verify RPC env vars; skip or fallback when missing.
• Prefer useTraceFilter = true to detect internal calls; fall back to block scanning if your RPC lacks trace_filter.
• For large ranges, use a paid RPC to avoid rate limits; useTraceFilter reduces calls.
• Use forkByTxHash = true only when debugging state-dependent failures.
• Use blockRange = 1 for a specific known exploit tx.
• If your invariant is keyed by msg.data (timelocks), rebuild calldata from selector + args; call inputs exclude the selector.
• Interpret results: PASS, NEEDS_REVIEW (selector mismatch or replay failure), ASSERTION_FAIL (often false positives or gas), UNKNOWN_ERROR (RPC or unexpected).
• If many NEEDS_REVIEW, the selector/target does not match or you need forkByTxHash.

Rationalizations to Reject

• "We only need unit tests." Backtesting catches real-world call patterns.
• "Trace filter is optional." Without it you miss internal calls.
• "forkByTxHash everywhere." It is slow and RPC-heavy; use it for debugging only.
• "RPC isn't needed." Backtesting requires a working RPC and FFI.

References

• Backtesting Template