Agent skill

architecture-patterns

Provides architectural pattern knowledge for designing feature implementations including MVC, event-driven, microservices, and CQRS patterns. Use when designing system architecture or choosing implementation patterns.

View SKILL.md on GitHub Repository
Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/architecture-patterns-sequenzia-agent-alchemy-3

SKILL.md

Architecture Patterns

This skill provides knowledge about common architectural patterns to help design feature implementations. Apply these patterns based on the project's existing architecture and the feature's requirements.

Diagram Convention

Architecture visualizations use Mermaid syntax with classDef styling (color:#000 for text readability). When creating architecture visualizations based on these patterns, follow consistent diagram styling conventions for dark text on nodes.

Pattern Selection Guide

Choose patterns based on:

  1. Existing architecture - Match what is already in use
  2. Team familiarity - Use patterns the team knows
  3. Feature requirements - Some patterns fit better for certain features
  4. Scale requirements - Consider current and future scale

Layered Architecture (N-Tier)

When to use: Most web applications, CRUD operations, clear separation of concerns needed

Layers:

mermaid
flowchart TD
    A["Presentation Layer -- UI, API endpoints, controllers"]:::primary
    B["Application Layer -- Use cases, orchestration, DTOs"]:::secondary
    C["Domain Layer -- Business logic, entities, rules"]:::success
    D["Infrastructure Layer -- Database, external services, I/O"]:::neutral
    A --> B --> C --> D

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef secondary fill:#f3e8ff,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#000
    classDef success fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#000
    classDef neutral fill:#f3f4f6,stroke:#6b7280,color:#000

Key rules:

  • Dependencies flow downward only
  • Each layer only talks to the layer directly below
  • Domain layer has no external dependencies

Implementation tips:

  • Use interfaces at layer boundaries
  • Keep domain logic in the domain layer, not controllers
  • Use DTOs to transfer data between layers

MVC (Model-View-Controller)

When to use: Web applications with server-rendered views, simple CRUD apps

Components:

mermaid
flowchart LR
    U1[User]:::neutral -->|input| CT[Controller]:::primary
    CT -->|updates| M[Model]:::secondary
    M -->|reads| CT
    CT -->|renders| V[View]:::success
    V -->|response| U2[User]:::neutral

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef secondary fill:#f3e8ff,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#000
    classDef success fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#000
    classDef neutral fill:#f3f4f6,stroke:#6b7280,color:#000

Model: Data and business logic View: Presentation/UI Controller: Handles input, coordinates model and view

Implementation tips:

  • Keep controllers thin - delegate to services
  • Models should be framework-agnostic when possible
  • Views should have minimal logic

Repository Pattern

When to use: Data access abstraction, testability, multiple data sources

Structure:

typescript
interface UserRepository {
  findById(id: string): Promise<User | null>;
  findByEmail(email: string): Promise<User | null>;
  save(user: User): Promise<User>;
  delete(id: string): Promise<void>;
}

class PostgresUserRepository implements UserRepository {
  // Implementation using PostgreSQL
}

class InMemoryUserRepository implements UserRepository {
  // Implementation for testing
}

Benefits:

  • Abstracts data access details
  • Easy to swap implementations
  • Simplifies testing with in-memory implementations

Service Layer Pattern

When to use: Complex business logic, multiple entry points (API, CLI, queue)

Structure:

typescript
class UserService {
  constructor(
    private userRepo: UserRepository,
    private emailService: EmailService,
    private logger: Logger
  ) {}

  async registerUser(data: RegisterDTO): Promise<User> {
    // Validation
    // Business logic
    // Coordination of multiple repositories/services
    // Return result
  }
}

Implementation tips:

  • Services contain business logic, not controllers
  • One service per domain concept
  • Services can call other services (but avoid cycles)

Event-Driven Architecture

When to use: Decoupled components, async processing, audit trails, notifications

Patterns:

Event Emitter (Simple)

typescript
// Emit events for side effects
userService.on('userCreated', async (user) => {
  await emailService.sendWelcome(user);
  await analyticsService.trackSignup(user);
});

Message Queue (Distributed)

mermaid
flowchart LR
    P[Producer]:::primary --> Q[Queue]:::warning
    Q --> C1[Consumer 1]:::secondary
    Q --> C2[Consumer 2]:::secondary

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef secondary fill:#f3e8ff,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#000
    classDef warning fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#d97706,color:#000

Event structure:

typescript
interface DomainEvent {
  type: string;
  timestamp: Date;
  payload: unknown;
  metadata: {
    correlationId: string;
    causationId: string;
  };
}

Implementation tips:

  • Events should be immutable
  • Include enough context to process without additional queries
  • Handle idempotency for at-least-once delivery

CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)

When to use: Complex domains, different read/write patterns, high-performance reads needed

Structure:

mermaid
flowchart TD
    subgraph write["Commands (Write)"]
        CMD[Command]:::primary --> CH[Command Handler]:::secondary
        CH --> WM[Write Model]:::secondary
        WM --> WDB[Write Database]:::neutral
    end
    subgraph read["Queries (Read)"]
        QRY[Query]:::primary --> QH[Query Handler]:::secondary
        QH --> RM[Read Model]:::secondary
        RM --> RDB[Read Database]:::neutral
    end

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef secondary fill:#f3e8ff,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#000
    classDef neutral fill:#f3f4f6,stroke:#6b7280,color:#000

    style write fill:#f8fafc,stroke:#94a3b8,color:#000
    style read fill:#f8fafc,stroke:#94a3b8,color:#000

Simplified CQRS:

typescript
// Commands modify state
class CreateUserCommand {
  execute(data: CreateUserDTO): Promise<void>
}

// Queries return data without modification
class GetUserQuery {
  execute(id: string): Promise<UserDTO>
}

Implementation tips:

  • Start simple - same database, different models
  • Use for complex domains where read/write models differ
  • Consider eventual consistency implications

Ports and Adapters (Hexagonal)

When to use: High testability needs, multiple I/O channels, long-lived applications

Structure:

mermaid
flowchart TD
    subgraph driving["Driving Adapters"]
        H[HTTP]:::primary
        CL[CLI]:::primary
        Q[Queue]:::primary
        T[Timer]:::primary
    end
    subgraph core["Application Core"]
        subgraph domain["Domain Logic"]
            DL[Business Rules]:::success
        end
    end
    subgraph driven["Driven Adapters"]
        DB[Database]:::neutral
        CA[Cache]:::neutral
        EM[Email]:::neutral
        API[External API]:::neutral
    end
    H -->|port| DL
    CL -->|port| DL
    Q -->|port| DL
    T -->|port| DL
    DL -->|port| DB
    DL -->|port| CA
    DL -->|port| EM
    DL -->|port| API

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef success fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#000
    classDef neutral fill:#f3f4f6,stroke:#6b7280,color:#000

    style driving fill:#f8fafc,stroke:#94a3b8,color:#000
    style core fill:#fefce8,stroke:#ca8a04,color:#000
    style domain fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#000
    style driven fill:#f8fafc,stroke:#94a3b8,color:#000

Key concept: Business logic at center, all I/O through ports/adapters

Implementation tips:

  • Define ports (interfaces) for all external interactions
  • Adapters implement ports for specific technologies
  • Domain code never imports adapter code

Microservices Patterns

When to use: Large teams, independent deployability, different scaling needs

API Gateway

Single entry point that routes to services

Service Discovery

Services register themselves, clients look them up

Circuit Breaker

Prevent cascade failures when services are down

typescript
const breaker = new CircuitBreaker(remoteService.call, {
  timeout: 3000,
  errorThreshold: 50,
  resetTimeout: 30000
});

Saga Pattern

Coordinate transactions across services

mermaid
flowchart LR
    SA[Service A]:::primary -->|step 1| SB[Service B]:::primary -->|step 2| SC[Service C]:::primary
    SC -.->|failure| CC[Compensate C]:::danger
    CC -.-> CB[Compensate B]:::danger
    CB -.-> CA[Compensate A]:::danger

    classDef primary fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#000
    classDef danger fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,color:#000

Choosing the Right Pattern

Scenario Recommended Pattern
Simple CRUD app MVC + Repository
Complex business logic Layered + Service Layer
Need audit trail Event-Driven
High read/write disparity CQRS
Maximum testability Hexagonal
Multiple teams/services Microservices patterns

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Big Ball of Mud - No clear structure
  2. God Object - One class does everything
  3. Spaghetti Code - Tangled dependencies
  4. Golden Hammer - Using one pattern for everything
  5. Premature Optimization - Complex patterns for simple needs

Application Guidelines

  1. Match existing architecture - Do not introduce new patterns unnecessarily
  2. Start simple - Add complexity only when needed
  3. Document decisions - Explain why a pattern was chosen
  4. Consider team skills - A simpler pattern well-executed beats a complex one poorly understood

Integration Notes

What this component does: Provides a reference catalog of architectural patterns (layered, MVC, repository, service layer, event-driven, CQRS, hexagonal, microservices) with selection guidance, Mermaid diagrams, and implementation tips.

Capabilities needed:

  • None (reference-only skill -- provides knowledge, does not require tool access)

Adaptation guidance:

  • This is a passive knowledge skill loaded by feature-dev during architecture design
  • The Mermaid diagrams use a specific styling convention (dark text on light backgrounds) -- adapt if your rendering environment has different requirements
  • Can be extended with additional patterns relevant to your domain

Configurable parameters: None

Recommended Agent Skills

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-spec

Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.

163 31
Explore
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-state

Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.

163 31
Explore
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-spec

Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.

163 31
Explore
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-testing

Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.

163 31
Explore
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-testing

Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.

163 31
Explore
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

agent-ops-state

Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.

163 31
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results