Agent skill

architecture-decision-record

Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.

Stars 143
Forks 15

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/tree/main/src/skills/architecture-decision-record

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

category
document-asset-creation

SKILL.md

Architecture Decision Records

Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) are lightweight documents that capture important architectural decisions along with their context and consequences. This skill provides templates, examples, and best practices for creating and maintaining ADRs in your projects.

Overview

  • Making significant technology choices (databases, frameworks, cloud providers)
  • Designing system architecture or major components
  • Establishing patterns or conventions for the team
  • Evaluating trade-offs between multiple approaches
  • Documenting decisions that will impact future development

Why ADRs Matter

ADRs serve as architectural memory for your team:

  • Context Preservation: Capture why decisions were made, not just what was decided
  • Onboarding: Help new team members understand architectural rationale
  • Prevent Revisiting: Avoid endless debates about settled decisions
  • Track Evolution: See how architecture evolved over time
  • Accountability: Clear ownership and decision timeline

ADR Format (Nygard Template)

Each ADR should follow this structure:

1. Title

Format: ADR-####: [Decision Title] Example: ADR-0001: Adopt Microservices Architecture

2. Status

Current state of the decision:

  • Proposed: Under consideration
  • Accepted: Decision approved and being implemented
  • Superseded: Replaced by a later decision (reference ADR number)
  • Deprecated: No longer recommended but not yet replaced
  • Rejected: Considered but not adopted (document why)

3. Context

What to include:

  • Problem statement or opportunity
  • Business/technical constraints
  • Stakeholder requirements
  • Current state of the system
  • Forces at play (conflicting concerns)

4. Decision

What to include:

  • The choice being made
  • Key principles or patterns to follow
  • What will change as a result
  • Who is responsible for implementation

Be specific and actionable:

  • ✅ "We will adopt microservices architecture using Node.js with Express"
  • ❌ "We will consider using microservices"

5. Consequences

What to include:

  • Positive outcomes (benefits)
  • Negative outcomes (costs, risks, trade-offs)
  • Neutral outcomes (things that change but aren't clearly better/worse)

6. Alternatives Considered

Document at least 2 alternatives:

For each alternative, explain:

  • What it was
  • Why it was considered
  • Why it was not chosen

7. References (Optional)

Links to relevant resources:

  • Meeting notes or discussion threads
  • Related ADRs
  • External research or articles
  • Proof of concept implementations

ADR Lifecycle

Proposed → Accepted → [Implemented] → (Eventually) Superseded/Deprecated
          ↓
      Rejected

Best Practices

1. Keep ADRs Immutable

Once accepted, don't edit ADRs. Create new ADRs that supersede old ones.

  • ✅ Create ADR-0015 that supersedes ADR-0003
  • ❌ Update ADR-0003 with new decisions

2. Write in Present Tense

ADRs are historical records written as if the decision is being made now.

  • ✅ "We will adopt microservices"
  • ❌ "We adopted microservices"

3. Focus on 'Why', Not 'How'

ADRs capture decisions, not implementation details.

  • ✅ "We chose PostgreSQL for relational consistency"
  • ❌ "Configure PostgreSQL with these specific settings..."

4. Review ADRs as Team

Get input from relevant stakeholders before accepting.

  • Architects: Technical viability
  • Developers: Implementation feasibility
  • Product: Business alignment
  • DevOps: Operational concerns

5. Number Sequentially

Use 4-digit zero-padded numbers: ADR-0001, ADR-0002, etc. Maintain a single sequence even with multiple projects.

6. Store in Git

Keep ADRs in version control alongside code:

  • Location: /docs/adr/ or /architecture/decisions/
  • Format: Markdown for easy reading
  • Branch: Same branch as implementation

Quick Start Checklist

Option 1: Use Script-Enhanced Generator (Recommended)

  • Run /create-adr [number] [title] to generate ADR with auto-filled context
  • ADR number, date, and author are auto-populated
  • Review and fill in decision details
  • Set Status to "Proposed" and review with team

Option 2: Use Static Template

  • Copy ADR template from assets/adr-template.md
  • Assign next sequential number (check existing ADRs)
  • Fill in Context: problem, constraints, requirements
  • Document Decision: what, why, how, who
  • List Consequences: positive, negative, neutral
  • Describe at least 2 Alternatives: what, pros/cons, why not chosen
  • Add References: discussions, research, related ADRs
  • Set Status to "Proposed"
  • Review with team
  • Update Status to "Accepted" after approval
  • Link ADR in implementation PR
  • Update Status to "Implemented" after deployment

Available Scripts

  • scripts/create-adr.md - Dynamic ADR generator with auto-filled context

    • Auto-fills: ADR number, date, author, total ADRs count
    • Usage: /create-adr [number] [title]
    • Uses $ARGUMENTS and !command for dynamic context
  • assets/adr-template.md - Static template for manual use

Rules Quick Reference

Rule Impact What It Covers
interrogation-scalability HIGH Scale questions, data volume, growth projections
interrogation-reliability HIGH Data patterns, UX impact, coherence validation
interrogation-security HIGH Access control, tenant isolation, attack surface

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Too Technical: "We'll use Kubernetes with these 50 YAML configs..." ✅ Right Level: "We'll use Kubernetes for container orchestration because..."

Too Vague: "We'll use a better database" ✅ Specific: "We'll use PostgreSQL 15+ for transactional data because..."

No Alternatives: Only documenting the chosen solution ✅ Comparative: Document why alternatives weren't chosen

Missing Consequences: Only listing benefits ✅ Balanced: Honest about costs and trade-offs

No Context: "We decided to use Redis" ✅ Contextual: "Given our 1M+ concurrent users and sub-50ms latency requirement..."

Related Skills

  • ork:api-design: Use when designing APIs referenced in ADRs
  • ork:database-patterns: Use when ADR involves database choices
  • security-checklist: Consult when ADR has security implications

Skill Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-08 Maintained by: AI Agent Hub Team

Capability Details

adr-creation

Keywords: adr, architecture decision, decision record, document decision Solves:

  • How do I document an architectural decision?
  • Create an ADR
  • Architecture decision template

adr-best-practices

Keywords: when to write adr, adr lifecycle, adr workflow, adr process, adr review, quantify impact Solves:

  • When should I write an ADR?
  • How do I manage ADR lifecycle?
  • What's the ADR review process?
  • How to quantify decision impact?
  • ADR anti-patterns to avoid
  • Link related ADRs

tradeoff-analysis

Keywords: tradeoff, pros cons, alternatives, comparison, evaluate options Solves:

  • How do I analyze tradeoffs?
  • Compare architectural options
  • Document alternatives considered

consequences

Keywords: consequence, impact, risk, benefit, outcome Solves:

  • What are the consequences of this decision?
  • Document decision impact
  • Risk and benefit analysis

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

yonatangross/orchestkit

expect

Diff-aware AI browser testing — analyzes git changes, generates targeted test plans, and executes them via agent-browser. Reads git diff to determine what changed, maps changes to affected pages via route map, generates a test plan scoped to the diff, and runs it with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, running regression checks on changed components, or validating that recent code changes don't break the user-facing experience.

143 15
Explore
yonatangross/orchestkit

github-operations

GitHub CLI operations for issues, PRs, milestones, and Projects v2. Covers gh commands, REST API patterns, and automation scripts. Use when managing GitHub issues, PRs, milestones, or Projects with gh.

143 15
Explore
yonatangross/orchestkit

chain-patterns

Chain patterns for CC 2.1.71 pipelines — MCP detection, handoff files, checkpoint-resume, worktree agents, CronCreate monitoring. Use when building multi-phase pipeline skills. Loaded via skills: field by pipeline skills (fix-issue, implement, brainstorm, verify). Not user-invocable.

143 15
Explore
yonatangross/orchestkit

storybook-mcp-integration

Storybook MCP server integration for component-aware AI development. Covers 6 tools across 3 toolsets (dev, docs, testing): component discovery via list-all-documentation/get-documentation, story previews via preview-stories, and automated testing via run-story-tests. Use when generating components that should reuse existing Storybook components, running component tests via MCP, or previewing stories in chat.

143 15
Explore
yonatangross/orchestkit

component-search

Search 21st.dev component registry for production-ready React components. Finds components by natural language description, filters by framework and style system, returns ranked results with install instructions. Use when looking for UI components, finding alternatives to existing components, or sourcing design system building blocks.

143 15
Explore
yonatangross/orchestkit

ai-ui-generation

AI-assisted UI generation patterns for json-render, v0, Bolt, and Cursor workflows. Covers prompt engineering for component generation, review checklists for AI-generated code, design token injection, refactoring for design system conformance, and CI gates for quality assurance. Use when generating UI components with AI tools, rendering multi-surface MCP visual output, reviewing AI-generated code, or integrating AI output into design systems.

143 15
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results