Agent skill
analyzing-proposals
Analyzes business proposals and RFP documents, evaluating pricing, deadlines, and technical specifications for feasibility. Generates go/no-go reports. Use for proposal analysis, RFP review, bidding assessment, or business feasibility evaluation.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/jiunbae/agent-skills/tree/main/business/proposal-analyzer
SKILL.md
Proposal Analyzer
Evaluate proposals and RFPs for feasibility.
Analysis Criteria
| Aspect | Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Budget | Is pricing realistic? Competitive? |
| Timeline | Achievable with resources? |
| Tech Specs | Within capability? Risks? |
| Scope | Clear? Complete? Ambiguous areas? |
| Terms | Favorable? Red flags? |
Workflow
Step 1: Document Extraction
Read proposal (PDF/DOCX) and extract:
- Project name, client
- Budget range
- Timeline/milestones
- Technical requirements
- Terms & conditions
Step 2: Feasibility Check
For each requirement:
- Can we deliver? (Y/N/Partial)
- Required resources
- Risk level (Low/Medium/High)
Step 3: Generate Report
# Proposal Analysis: {Project Name}
## Summary
- Client: {name}
- Budget: {amount}
- Duration: {timeline}
- Verdict: **GO** / **NO-GO** / **CONDITIONAL**
## Feasibility Matrix
| Requirement | Feasible | Risk | Notes |
|-------------|----------|------|-------|
| Feature A | ✅ | Low | Existing capability |
| Feature B | ⚠️ | Medium | Needs R&D |
| Feature C | ❌ | High | Outside expertise |
## Budget Analysis
- Estimated cost: {amount}
- Margin: {%}
- Competitive: Yes/No
## Timeline Assessment
- Realistic: Yes/No
- Buffer needed: {weeks}
## Recommendation
{Detailed recommendation with conditions}
Red Flags to Watch
- Vague scope with fixed price
- Unrealistic timeline
- Unlimited revisions clause
- IP ownership unclear
- Penalty clauses
Best Practices
- Always quantify risks
- Compare with past similar projects
- Identify negotiable terms
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
implementing-in-background
Orchestrates multiple AI agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) for parallel implementation in the background. Separates independent tasks from planning docs, each agent writes code directly. Context-safe with auto-save. Use for "백그라운드 구현", "bg impl", "병렬 구현", "Codex로 구현", "구현해줘", "코드 작성해줘" requests.
review-fix-loop
Autonomous review-fix cycle that continuously reviews code using background-reviewer, fixes issues, and repeats until all findings are resolved. Use for "리뷰 루프", "자동 개선", "review fix loop", "리뷰 반복", "코드 개선 루프", "keep reviewing" requests.
planning-in-background
Orchestrates multiple AI agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) for parallel planning in the background with auto-save. Agents continue running even when session hits context limits. Use for "백그라운드 기획", "bg plan", "병렬 기획", "멀티 AI 기획", "기획해줘", "N명이 기획", "계획", "플래닝", "plan", "설계" requests.
background-reviewer
Orchestrates multi-LLM parallel code review using Claude, Codex, and Gemini. Each agent reviews from a different perspective using agent personas (security, architecture, code quality, performance). Supports persona-based review via `agt persona review`. Use for "코드 리뷰", "리뷰해줘", "bg review", "멀티 리뷰", "background review", "페르소나 리뷰" requests.
managing-context
Discovers and loads relevant project context from markdown documentation before each task. Matches context documents based on keywords, file paths, and task types. Use at task start to access project plans, architecture, and implementation status.
indexing-static-context
Provides an index of global static context files in ~/.agents/. Returns appropriate static file paths for natural language queries like "내 정보", "보안 규칙". Use when other skills or agents need to locate reference information.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?