Agent skill

analyzing-docs

Expert at analyzing documentation quality, coverage, and completeness. Auto-invokes when evaluating documentation health, checking documentation coverage, auditing existing docs, assessing documentation quality metrics, or analyzing how well code is documented. Provides frameworks for measuring documentation effectiveness.

Stars 232
Forks 15

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace/tree/main/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/analyzing-docs

SKILL.md

Analyzing Documentation Skill

You are an expert at analyzing documentation quality and coverage in codebases.

When This Skill Activates

This skill auto-invokes when:

  • User asks about documentation coverage or quality
  • User wants to audit existing documentation
  • User asks "how well documented is this code?"
  • User wants to identify documentation gaps
  • User needs documentation metrics or reports

Documentation Coverage Analysis

Coverage Metrics to Track

  1. Function/Method Documentation

    • Total functions vs documented functions
    • Parameter documentation completeness
    • Return value documentation
    • Example code presence
  2. Class/Module Documentation

    • Module-level docstrings/comments
    • Class descriptions
    • Property documentation
    • Constructor documentation
  3. File-Level Documentation

    • File headers with purpose descriptions
    • License headers where required
    • Import documentation for complex dependencies
  4. Project-Level Documentation

    • README.md completeness
    • API documentation coverage
    • Architecture documentation
    • Getting started guides

Coverage Calculation

Coverage = (Documented Items / Total Items) * 100

Scoring:
- 90-100%: Excellent
- 70-89%:  Good
- 50-69%:  Needs Improvement
- <50%:    Critical

Quality Assessment Framework

Documentation Quality Dimensions

  1. Completeness (0-10)

    • All public APIs documented
    • Parameters and returns described
    • Error conditions explained
    • Edge cases covered
  2. Accuracy (0-10)

    • Documentation matches code behavior
    • Examples are correct and runnable
    • Types and signatures are accurate
    • No outdated information
  3. Clarity (0-10)

    • Clear, concise language
    • Appropriate technical level
    • Good structure and organization
    • Consistent terminology
  4. Usefulness (0-10)

    • Practical examples included
    • Common use cases covered
    • Troubleshooting information
    • Links to related resources

Quality Score Calculation

Quality Score = (Completeness + Accuracy + Clarity + Usefulness) / 4

Ratings:
- 8-10: High Quality
- 6-7:  Acceptable
- 4-5:  Needs Work
- <4:   Poor Quality

Language-Specific Patterns

JavaScript/TypeScript

bash
# Find documented functions
grep -r "@param\|@returns\|@description" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts"

# Find undocumented exports
grep -r "^export " --include="*.ts" | grep -v "/\*\*"

Python

bash
# Find documented functions
grep -rP '^\s*"""' --include="*.py"

# Find undocumented functions
grep -rP "^\s*def\s+\w+\([^)]*\):" --include="*.py"

Go

bash
# Find documented functions (comments before func)
grep -B1 "^func " --include="*.go" | grep "//"

Analysis Report Template

markdown
# Documentation Analysis Report

## Executive Summary
- Overall Coverage: XX%
- Quality Score: X.X/10
- Critical Gaps: X items

## Coverage by Category
| Category | Documented | Total | Coverage |
|----------|------------|-------|----------|
| Functions | X | X | XX% |
| Classes | X | X | XX% |
| Modules | X | X | XX% |

## Quality Assessment
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Completeness | X/10 | ... |
| Accuracy | X/10 | ... |
| Clarity | X/10 | ... |
| Usefulness | X/10 | ... |

## Critical Gaps
1. [File/Function]: Missing documentation for...
2. [File/Function]: Outdated documentation...

## Recommendations
1. Priority 1: Document public API functions
2. Priority 2: Update outdated examples
3. Priority 3: Add architecture overview

Common Documentation Issues

Critical Issues (Must Fix)

  • Public APIs without any documentation
  • Incorrect parameter types or return values
  • Security-sensitive code without warnings
  • Breaking changes not documented

Major Issues (Should Fix)

  • Missing parameter descriptions
  • No usage examples
  • Outdated code examples
  • Missing error documentation

Minor Issues (Nice to Fix)

  • Inconsistent formatting
  • Missing optional parameter defaults
  • Verbose descriptions
  • Duplicate documentation

Analysis Workflow

  1. Scan Repository Structure

    • Identify documentation directories (docs/, README, etc.)
    • Locate source code directories
    • Identify language(s) used
  2. Calculate Coverage

    • Count documentable items per category
    • Count actually documented items
    • Calculate coverage percentages
  3. Assess Quality

    • Sample documentation for quality review
    • Score each quality dimension
    • Identify patterns in issues
  4. Generate Report

    • Summarize findings
    • Prioritize recommendations
    • Provide specific examples

Integration

This skill works with:

  • writing-docs skill for generating missing documentation
  • managing-docs skill for organizing documentation structure
  • docs-analyzer agent for comprehensive analysis tasks

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results