Agent skill

adr-review

Multi-agent debate orchestration for Architecture Decision Records. Automatically triggers on ADR create/edit/delete. Coordinates architect, critic, independent-thinker, security, analyst, and high-level-advisor agents in structured debate rounds until consensus.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/devops/adr-review-rjmurillo-ai-agents

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

type
orchestrator
inputs
[
    "adr-file-path",
    "change-type"
]
domains
[
    "architecture",
    "governance",
    "multi-agent",
    "consensus"
]
outputs
[
    "debate-log",
    "updated-adr",
    "recommendations"
]
file triggers
{
    "events": [
        "create",
        "update",
        "delete"
    ],
    "patterns": [
        ".agents/architecture/ADR-*.md",
        "docs/architecture/ADR-*.md"
    ],
    "auto_invoke": true
}
subagent model
claude-opus-4-5

SKILL.md

ADR Review

Multi-agent debate pattern for rigorous ADR validation. Orchestrates 6 specialized agents through structured review rounds until consensus or 10 rounds maximum.

Quick Start

text
# Manual triggers:
/adr-review .agents/architecture/ADR-005-api-versioning.md
"review this ADR"
"validate ADR-005"

Automatic Detection: A Claude Code hook (Invoke-ADRChangeDetection.ps1) runs at session start and detects ADR changes, prompting you to invoke this skill. The pre-commit hook also detects staged ADR files and displays a reminder.

Input Output Consensus Required
ADR file path Debate log + Updated ADR 6/6 Accept or D&C

File Triggers

Pattern Location Events
ADR-*.md .agents/architecture/ create, update, delete
ADR-*.md docs/architecture/ create, update, delete

Detection: .claude/skills/adr-review/scripts/Detect-ADRChanges.ps1

When to Use

MANDATORY Triggers (automatic):

  • Architect creates or updates an ADR
  • ANY agent modifies .agents/architecture/ADR-*.md

User-Initiated Triggers (manual):

  • User requests ADR review ("review this ADR", "validate this decision")
  • User requests multi-perspective validation for strategic decisions

Agent Roles

Agent Focus Tie-Breaker Role
architect Structure, governance, coherence, ADR compliance Structural questions
critic Gaps, risks, alignment, completeness None
independent-thinker Challenge assumptions, surface contrarian views None
security Threat models, security trade-offs None
analyst Root cause, evidence, feasibility None
high-level-advisor Priority, resolve conflicts, break ties Decision paralysis

Debate Protocol

Phase Purpose Details
Phase 0 Related work research Search issues/PRs for context
Phase 1 Independent review Each agent reviews ADR
Phase 2 Consolidation Identify consensus and conflicts
Phase 3 Resolution Propose updates for P0/P1 issues
Phase 4 Convergence check Agents vote: Accept/D&C/Block

Consensus: All 6 agents Accept OR Disagree-and-Commit. Max 10 rounds.

See references/debate-protocol.md for full phase details.

Deletion Workflow

Phase Purpose
D1 Detection - identify deleted ADR
D2 Impact assessment - find dependencies
D3 Archival decision - archive accepted ADRs
D4 Cleanup - update references

See references/deletion-workflow.md for full workflow.

Issue Resolution

Priority Requirement Gate
P0 Must resolve BLOCKING
P1 Resolve OR defer with issue BLOCKING
P2 Document Non-blocking

See references/issue-resolution.md for deferral protocol.

Scripts

Script Purpose
Detect-ADRChanges.ps1 Detect ADR file changes for auto-trigger
powershell
# Basic detection
& .claude/skills/adr-review/scripts/Detect-ADRChanges.ps1

# Compare to specific commit
& .claude/skills/adr-review/scripts/Detect-ADRChanges.ps1 -SinceCommit "abc123"

Verification Checklist

After skill invocation:

  • Debate log exists at .agents/critique/ADR-NNN-debate-log.md
  • ADR status updated (proposed/accepted/needs-revision)
  • All P0 issues addressed or documented
  • Dissent captured for Disagree-and-Commit positions
  • Recommendations provided to orchestrator

Anti-Patterns

Avoid Why Instead
Single-agent ADR review Misses domain expertise Use full 6-agent debate
Skipping Phase 0 Duplicates existing work Always research first
Ignoring D&C dissent Loses important context Document all reservations
Manual ADR monitoring Error-prone Use Detect-ADRChanges.ps1
Deleting accepted ADRs without archive Loses knowledge Always archive accepted ADRs

References

Document Content
debate-protocol.md Full Phases 0-4 workflow
deletion-workflow.md Phases D1-D4 workflow
issue-resolution.md P0/P1/P2 handling and deferral
artifacts.md Output formats and templates
agent-prompts.md Detailed agent prompt templates

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results